Free Mail Envelope

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Gary E. Treitsch, Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Nick Turner, Harris County Attorney

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 1019 Congress Avenue #15

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77002]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Laura Cahill, Harris County Attorney

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 1019 Congress Avenue, #15

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77002]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Calvin Harvey, Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Kay Aune, Assistant Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Clay Cossey, Assistant Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Lawanda Howse, Assistant Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Lisa Casteneda, Deputy Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Peter Key, Deputy Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

John Tyler, Deputy Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Patti Evans, Assistant Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

Quinto Alberto, Assistant Director

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

General Post-office. Zip Code Exempt                                                                                                                                    POSTAGE PAID

[Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn]                                                                                                                                     UPU RL 114 (2.2)

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas Republic [RFD 76135]

Non-Domestic, without the UNITED STATES                                                                                                        __________________ stamp/seal

18 U.S. Code § 1701: Obstruction of mails generally…                                                                      Foreign Office of Origin

 

USPS International Mail Manual

Harris County Toll Road Authority

John R. Blount, Harris County Engineer

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc7_011.htm

742.1 Marking Postage Paid

742.2 Parcels wo stamps – treat as Pre Paid

c/o 1101 Preston, 7th Floor

Private Property – No Trespassing                                           Houston, Texas [RFD 77002]

Non-Domestic, Zip Code Exempt, without the UNITED STATES

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Toll Road Letter

From:

Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn

Non-Domestic Mail

C/O 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas

ZIP CODE EXEMPT

 

By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3659 To:   By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3666 To:

Gary E Trietsch, Director                                           Nick Turner, Harris County Attorney

7701 Wilshire Place Drive                                          1019 Congress Avenue #15

Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]                                     Houston, Texas [RFD 77002]

Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES                               Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES

 

By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3673 To:   By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3680 To:

Laura Cahill, Harris County Attorney                          Calvin Harvey, Director

1019 Congress Avenue #15                                       7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Houston, Texas [RFD 77002]                                     Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES                               Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES

 

By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3697 To:   By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3703 To:

Kay Aune, Assistant Director                                      Clay Cossey, Assistant Director

7701 Wilshire Place Drive                                          7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]                                     Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES                               Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES

 

By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3710 To:   By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3727 To:

Lawanda Howse, Assistant Director                           Lisa Casteneda, Deputy Director

7701 Wilshire Place Drive                                          7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]                                     Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES                               Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES

 

By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3734 To:   By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3741 To:

Peter Key, Deputy Director                                        John Tyler, Deputy Director

7701 Wilshire Place Drive                                          7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]                                     Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES                               Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES

 

By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3758 To:   By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3765 To:

Patti Evans, Assistant Director                                   Quinton Alberto, Assistant Director

7701 Wilshire Place Drive                                          7701 Wilshire Place Drive

Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]                                     Houston, Texas [RFD 77040]

Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES                               Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES

 

By Certified Mail 7004 2890 0001 5665 3772 To:

John R Blount, Harris County Engineer

1101 Preston, 7th Floor

Houston, Texas [RFD 77002]

Non-Domestic, ZIP Exempt, Without the UNITED STATES

 

NON-NEGOTIABLE                                                                         NON-NEGOTIABLE

NOTICE AND DEMAND

 

I, Me, My, Myself, a man, a living soul, a sovereign, and a holder of the office of “the people”, with an address correction: C/O Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, Non-Domestic Mail, C/O 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437, Fort Worth, Texas, WITHOUT the UNITED STATES, do hereby Notice you by Declaration, of the following:

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that I am in receipt of your hearsay evidence, a true copy of some of which is attached hereto, and the question I have is; Do you have any witnesses to this alleged crime?

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, equality under the Law is paramount and mandatory by Law.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, I did not give you, the authority for making a legal determination for Me.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, if you think or assume that you are representing Me, you are FIRED!

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, neither you, nor any other person, is competent in dealing with any of My affairs.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, I am competent for dealing in all of My affairs.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED of My copyright on the name(s) Glenn W. Fearn©, GLENN WINNINGHAM FEARN©, FEARN, GLENN WINNINGHAM©, or any derivative(s) thereof and others as found in NON-NEGOTIABLE COPYRIGHT NOTICE recorded with the PINAL COUNTY RECORDER at FEE NUMBER 2005-121243, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, you are ORDERED that any communication with me is to be signed “under the penalty of perjury”.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, any violation My copyright(s), or making a legal determination for Me, representing Me, or communicating with Me in any manner not “under penalty of perjury” would constitute an agreement to the fee of;
  1. a) ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), minimum; or,
  2. b) one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) if violated for the purpose of profit/gain; or,
  3. c) ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00) if violated for the purpose of profit or gain more than three (3) times within a year, for each and every violation, payable only in U.S. Constitution Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1, gold or silver specie pursuant to your 31 USC § 5112, and the Coinage Act of 1792.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, if you wish to communicate with Me, the sovereign living soul, you are required to address the letter EXACTLY as shown above, otherwise, additional damages and injuries will accrue.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, I am not a second class UNITED STATES citizen, 14th Amendment Citizen, corporation or other fictitious entity as found in CORPORATE DENIAL AFFIDAVIT, which is recorded with the Pinal County Recorder at FEE NUMBER 2013-032373, all of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that I can be a state citizen of Texas without being a US citizen

“Such construction ignores the rights of a state in virtue of its sovereignty to confer citizenship within its own limits, where the rights incident to such a status are not of the citizenship mentioned in the federal Constitution. It does not follow that, because one has all the rights and privileges of a citizen of a state, he must be a citizen of the United States. Such a distinction has long been recognized in this County.” See Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. (U.S.) 393, 15 L.Ed. 691; Mitchell v. Wells, 37 Miss. 235

 

“The rights of (original judicial) Citizens of the States, as such, are not under consideration in the fourteenth amendment. They stand as they did before the fourteenth amendment, and are fully guaranteed under other provisions.” United States v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829, 930 (1873).

 

“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)

 

“there is in our Political System, a government of each of the several states and a government of the United States  Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own.” . US vs. Cruikshank, 92 US 542,

 

“There is a clear distinction between national citizenship and state citizenship.” 256 P. 545, affirmed 278 US 123, Tashiro vs. Jordan

 

“One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson v State, 15 Ind. 449; Cory v Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis. 443.” Mc Donel v State, 90 Ind. Rep. 320 at pg 323;

 

Both before and after the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the U.S. in order to be a citizen of his State; Crosse v. Board of Supervisors, Baltimore, Md., 1966, 221 A. 2d 431 citing US Supreme Court Slaughter House Cases and U.S. v. Cruikshank 92 US 542, 549, 23 L. Ed 588 1875

 

“No white person born within the limits of the United States and subject to their jurisdiction, or born without those limits and subsequently naturalized under their laws, owes his status of citizenship to the recent amendments to the Federal Constitution.” Van Valkenburg v. Brown, 43 Cal 43

 

“All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every State and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property.” 42 USC § 1982

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that State Citizens are the ONLY ones living under free government

“State citizens are the only ones living under free government, whose rights are incapable of impairment by legislation or judicial decision.” Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 97, 1908

 

“State Citizenship is a vested substantial property right, and the State has no power to divest or impair these rights.”  Favot v. Kingsbury, (1929) 98 Cal. App. 284, 276 P. 1083,

 

“The State cannot diminish rights of the people.” Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516

 

“The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent contract.” see, Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.”
CRUDEN vs. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70

 

“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government.” City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that at common law I have the right to free travel on the highways

“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135

 

“The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.”  Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784

 

“the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference is a fundamental constitutional right” -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979)

 

“citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.” Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009

 

“The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .” Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963).

 

“The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions.” Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966).

 

“A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use.” Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41.

 

“The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.” Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236.

 

“The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts.” People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971)

 

“The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.” House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166.

 

“The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles.” Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666.

 

“The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.” Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468.

 

“A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle.” Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159; Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670

 

“There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456

 

“The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.” American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200

 

Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions [emphasis added]:

“(6) Motor vehicle. – The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways”

10) The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.

 

“A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received.” International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120 The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile.'”

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, since you have falsely accused Me with your “toll violation notice” under your federal Texas Transportation code, does that means that you intend to get one of your code enforcers to MURDER me just like a Harris County Sheriff did to somebody recently? Or do you intend to engage in the theft of property? Or do you intend to assault me with an unlawful arrest? Or do you intend to falsely imprison me? Or do you intend to kidnap me?

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that, no corporation has any standing to do anything in any court of law, therefore, in the event of a lawsuit, each of you will be sued in your personal capacity

“My opinion is and long has been that the mayor and aldermen of a city corporation, or the president and directors of a bank, or the president and directors of a railroad company and of other similar corporations, are the true parties that sue and are sued as trustees and representatives of the constantly changing stockholders…. A corporation, therefore, being not a natural person, but a mere creature of the mind, invisible and intangible, cannot be a citizen of a state, or of the United States, and cannot fall within the terms or the power of the above mentioned article, and can therefore neither plead nor be impleaded in the courts of the United States.” Rundle v Delaware & Raritan Canal Company 55 U.S. 80 (1852) [emphasis added],

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that your Texas Transportation Code is actually a federal statute for US citizens

“…..Federalizes State civil law, including common law.–The rule serves to federalize not only the statutory but the common law of a State. Kniffen v. Hercules Powder Co., 164 Kan. 196, 188 P.2d 980 (1948); Kaufman v. Hopper, 220 N.Y. 184. 115 N.E. 470 (1917), see also 151 App. Div. 28, 135 N.Y.Supp. 363 (1912), aff’d., 163 App. Div. 863, 146 N. Y. Supp. 1096 (1914); Norfolk & P.B.L.R. v. Parker,… STATE AND FEDERAL VENUE DISCUSSED: The civil laws effective in an area of exclusive Federal jurisdiction are Federal law, notwithstanding their derivation from State laws, and a cause arising under such laws may be brought in or removed to a Federal district court under sections 24 or 28 of the former Judicial Code (now sections 1331 and 1441 of title 28, United States Code), giving jurisdiction to such courts of civil actions arising under the “* * *laws * * * of the United States” where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs.” Jurisdiction over Federal Areas Within the States – Report of the Interdepartmental Committee for the Study of Jurisdiction over Federal Areas Within the States, Part II, A Text of the Law of Legislative Jurisdiction Submitted to the Attorney General and Transmitted to the President June 1957, page 156-158, & 165, and further,

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that I DEMAND to see your evidence that I am a US citizen, because there is no such thing as a US citizen

“…it might be correctly said that there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States. ….. A citizen of any one of the States of the Union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing.”          Ex Parte Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. Rep. 300,

 

“. . . (E)very taxpayer is a cestui qui trust having sufficient interest in the preventing abuse of the trust to be recognized in the field of this court’s prerogative jurisdiction .  .”  In Re Bolens (1912), 135 N.W. 164.

 

“A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT (Public Charitable Trust), the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc.” Congressional Record, June 13 1967, pp. 15641-15646

 

“Chap. 854. – An Act to establish a code of law for the District of Columbia.” which was Approved on March 3, 1901, by the Fifty-Sixth Congress, Session II, at 31 Stat. 1189, and in Sec. 117, at 31 Stat. 1208, where it says;

“That in addition to the jurisdiction conferred in the preceding section, plenary jurisdiction is hereby given to the said court holding the said special term to hear and determine all questions relative to the execution of any and all wills…”

and at Chapter Fifty-Six in Sec. 1617, at 31 Stat. 1432, where it says;

“The Legal Estate to be in Cestui Que Use”

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that the use of any statutes, codes, rules, regulations, or court citations, within any document created by Me, at any time, is only to notice that which is applicable to you, and is not intended, not shall it be construed, to mean that I have conferred, submitted to, or entered into any jurisdiction alluded to thereby.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that you have no right to assault me with your Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966

“(h) DEFINITION’s. …. “(3) MOTOR VEHICLE.-The term ‘motor vehicle’ means a self-propelled vehicle which is registered for highway use under the laws of any State or foreign country..” Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966 at Public Law 89-719 at 80 Stat. 1130-1131

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that in order for you to have jurisdiction, you have to prove that I consented to give up my God given common law right to the free use of the highways

“It is impossible to prove jurisdiction exists absent a substantial nexus with the state, such as voluntary subscription to license.  All jurisdictional facts supporting claim that supposed jurisdiction exists must appear on the record of the court.”  Pipe Line v Marathon. 102 S. Ct. 3858 quoting Crowell v Benson 883 US 22

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that your presumptions do not avoid liability for constitutional rights violations

“The power to create presumptions is not a means of escape from constitutional restrictions.” Bailey v Alabama, 219 U.S. 219, 238, et seq., 31 S.Ct. 145; Manley v Georgia, 279 U.S. 1, 5-6, 49 S.Ct. 215

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that your determination with your “TOLL VIOLATION NOTICE” is a Bill of Attainder

“bill of attainder. 2. A special legislative act prescribing punishment, without a trial, for a specific person or group. • Bills of attainder are prohibited by the U.S. Constitution (art. I, § 9, cl. 3; art. I, § 10, cl. 1). — Also termed act of attainder. See ATTAINDER; BILL OF PAINS AND PENALTIES . [Cases: Constitutional Law 82.5. C.J.S. Constitutional Law §§ 429–431.]” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition, page 496

 

“BILL OF PAINS AND PENALTIES bill of pains and penalties. A legislative act that, though similar to a bill of attainder, prescribes punishment less severe than capital punishment. • Bills of pains and penalties are included within the U.S. Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. U.S. Const. art I, § 9. [Cases: Constitutional Law 82.5. C.J.S. Constitutional Law §§ 429–431.]” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition, page 499

 

“Bill of Attainder” means Legislative acts, no matter what their form, that apply either to named individuals or to easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to inflict punishment on them without a judicial trial. United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 448-49, 85 S. Ct.  1707, 1715, 14 L.Ed. 484, 492; United States v. Lovett, 328 U.S. 303, 315, 66 S.Ct. 1073, 1079, 90 L.Ed. 1252.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that when dealing with a statute, all judges become bought and paid for Clerks, and cannot do anything judicial

“A judge ceases to set as a judicial officer because the governing principals of administrative law provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony, record, arguments and rationale for that of the agency.  Additionally, courts are prohibited from their substituting their judgments for that of the agency.” AISI v US, 568 F2d 284.

 

“When acting to enforce a statute and its subsequent amendments to the present date, the judge of the municipal court is acting as an administrative officer and not in a judicial capacity; courts administrating or enforcing statutes do not act judicially, but merely ministerially.” Thompson v. Smith 154 SE 583. [emphasis added]

 

“…judges who become involved in enforcement of mere statutes (civil or criminal in nature and otherwise), act as mere “clerks” of the involved agency…” K.C. Davis, ADMIN. LAW, Ch. 1 (CTP. West’s 1965 Ed.)

 

“It is the accepted rule, not only in state courts, but, of the federal courts as well, that when a judge is enforcing administrative law they are described as mere ‘extensions of the administrative agency for superior reviewing purposes’ as a ministerial clerk for an agency…” 30 Cal 596; 167 Cal 762.

 

and your “Toll Violation Notice” status is a fraud and a nullity

“Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their acts in attempting to exercise such powers are necessarily nullities” Burns v. Sup., Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that your determination with your “TOLL VIOLATION NOTICE” is a Void Judgment

“Where there is no jurisdiction there is no judge; the proceeding is as nothing. Such has been the law from the days of the Marshalsea, 10 Coke 68; also Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall 335,351.” Manning v. Ketcham, 58 F.2d 948.

 

“A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect” Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 27,  453 F.2d 645, 14 A.L.R. Fed. 298 (C.A. 1 Mass. 1972).  Hobbs v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management,  485 F.Supp. 456 (M.D. Fla. 1980).

 

“Void judgment is one which has no legal force or effect whatever, it is an absolute nullity, its invalidity may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place and it need not be attacked directly but may be attacked collaterally whenever and wherever it is interposed.”  City of Lufkin v. McVicker,  510 S.W. 2d 141 (Tex. Civ. App. – Beaumont 1973).

 

“…all acts of judges, magistrates, U.S. Marshals, sheriffs, local police, all void and not just voidable.” Nestor v. Hershey, 425 F2d 504

 

and each of you are personally responsible in the event that your Satanist code enforcers assault me, or kidnap me, or falsely imprison me, or engage in the theft of property.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that when you make a “Toll Violation Notice”, you are operating in your private capacity as a Revenue Officer under the federal Tax Lien Act of 1966, and you have no immunity, and you are personally liable

“Judge loses his absolute immunity from damage actions only when he acts in clear absence of all jurisdiction or performance of an act which is not judicial in nature.” Schucker v. Rockwood, 846 F.2d 1202

 

“When enforcing mere statutes, judges of all courts do not act judicially” and thus are not protected by “qualified” or “limited immunity,” SEE: Owen v. City, 445 U.S. 662; Bothke v. Terry, 713 F2d 1404

 

“Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a constitutional right, for they are deemed to know the law.” Owens v Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398 (Ezra 7:23-26)

 

“An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government”.  Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that I DEMAND that you provide proof that;
    1. I am a US citizen, AND,
    2. carrying passengers or property for hire, AND,
    3. that I have knowingly, willingly, and intentionally consented to give up my God given common law right to free travel on the highways, AND,
    4. your witnesses to this alleged crime, or

if I see or hear another word about this, I will sue each of you, in your personal capacity, for racketeering, among other things, in federal court.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that if you have any doubt that I have the capability to file a lawsuit, I suggest that you go to the US Supreme Court website and search for my name.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that you each are personally liable for any potential assaults, kidnappings, false imprisonments, thefts and MURDERS that may occur at the hands of your code enforcers, because of your presumptions, and your assaulting me with your District of Columbia codes.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that everything you do is a fraud and a lie, because
    1. You assault me with your fraudulent fictitious US citizen slave status
    2. You assault me with your fraudulent fictitious ZIP CODEs
    3. You present yourselves as a neutral and unbiased judge, when in reality you are bought and paid for
    4. You assault me with your satanic Roman law
    5. You assault me with your fraudulent fictitious hearsay evidence

“Once a fraud, always a fraud.” 13 Vin. Abr. 539.

 

“Things invalid from the beginning cannot be made valid by subsequent act.” Trayner, Max. 482. Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862

 

“A thing void in the beginning does not become valid by lapse of time.” 1 S. & R. 58.  Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1866

 

Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin. Dig. 50, 17, 29; Broom, Max. 178, Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862,

 

“Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom’s Max. 349.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856,

 

and any act by any government official to conceal the fraud becomes an act of fraud;

“fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law 1856

 

and fraud is inexcusable and unpardonable;

“Fraus et dolus nemini patrocianari debent. Fraud and deceit should excuse no man. 3 Co. 78.” Bouvier’s Maxims  of Law 1856

 

and any fraud amounts to injustice;

“Fraus et jus nunquam cohabitant. Fraud and justice never dwell together.” Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th Edition, page 1832

 

“Quod alias bonum et justum est, si per vim vei fraudem petatur, malum et injustum efficitur. What is otherwise good and just, if sought by force or fraud, becomes bad and unjust. 3 Co. 78.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856.

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that you are Satanists

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” John 8:44

 

“….. I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, [or Christians, etc.] and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” Revelations 2:9

 

and your judgment day is coming

“But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers [pharmaceutical drug pushers], and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” Revelations 21:8

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that your lying, thieving, murdering, Vatican, Jesuit, BAR member liars (attorneys) do NOT have authority to represent me, or make legal determinations for me, and if you think that they do, it will result in a racketeering lawsuit, with them named as well.

 

  • Gary E. Treitsch, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Nick Turner, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Laura Cahill, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Calvin Harvey, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Kay Aune, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Clay Cossey, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Lawanda Howse, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Lisa Casteneda, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Peter Key, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • John Tyler, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Patti Evans, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • Quinton Alberto, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

  • John R. Blount, before God, Angels, and these witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist!

 

 

  • Each of you are NOTICED that this Declaration is signed and sealed in red ink this _____________________ day of June in the year two thousand and sixteen, on the land of Texas pursuant to your Rule 201 of your Rules of Evidence, and locus sigilli

“locus sigilli – The place of the seal. Today this phrase is almost always abbreviated “L.S.” ” Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1026.

 

This Declaration is made before God, Angels and these witnesses and submitted “UNDER PENALTIES with PERJURY” [28 USC § 1746(1)].

 

Notice for the principal is notice for the agent and

notice for the agent is notice for the principal.

 

This instrument was prepared by Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn.

 

GLENN WINNINGHAM FEARN, and all derivatives thereof

My Copyright

 

 

______________________________________L. S.

Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, sui juris

sovereign living soul, holder of the office of “the People”

man on the land known as Texas, without the UNITED STATES

With full responsibility for my actions

under the Laws of YHWH  as found in the Holy Bible

 

Witnesses

 

Name                                                  Location                                                          Signature

 

 

_____________________                  ____________________                    ____________________

 

 

_____________________                  ____________________                    ____________________

 

 

_____________________                  ____________________                    ____________________

 

 

_____________________                  ____________________                    ____________________

 

 

_____________________                  ____________________                    ____________________

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Notice of Void Judgment

Azle Municipal Court

_________________________________________________________________

CAUSE NUMBER A023735

STATE OF TEXAS, INC.

            VS.

GLENN W FEARN

_________________________________________________________________

Notice of Void Judgment

_________________________________________________________________

 

I, Me, My, or Myself, also known as Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, a sovereign, living soul, a man living upon the land, a judicial power Citizen by right of blood, without the corporation called STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby provide Notice of Void Judgment, by Declaration, as follows;

  • Whenever a Judge is dealing with a statute, like the Texas Government Code, or the Texas Penal Code, or the Texas Code of Civil Procedure, he becomes a Clerk working for the prosecutor

“…judges who become involved in enforcement of mere statutes (civil or criminal in nature and otherwise), act as mere “clerks” of the involved agency…” K.C. Davis, ADMIN. LAW, Ch. 1 (CTP. West’s 1965 Ed.)

 

“It is the accepted rule, not only in state courts, but, of the federal courts as well, that when a judge is enforcing administrative law they are described as mere ‘extensions of the administrative agency for superior reviewing purposes’ as a ministerial clerk for an agency…” 30 Cal 596; 167 Cal 762

 

“”When acting to enforce a statute and its subsequent amendments to the present date, the judge of the municipal court is acting as an administrative officer and not in a judicial capacity; courts administrating or enforcing statutes do not act judicially, but merely ministerially….but merely act as an extension as an agent for the involved agency — but only in a “ministerial” and not a “discretionary capacity…” Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579, 583; Keller v. P.E., 261 US 428; F.R.C. v. G.E., 281, U.S. 464 [emphasis added]

 

  • When a Judge is operating as a Clerk masquerading as a Judge, he cannot do anything judicial, and if he attempts to do anything judicial, it is a nullity

“Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their acts in attempting to exercise such powers are necessarily nullitiesBurns v. Sup., Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1

 

  • Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven

“Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law, court is deprived of juris.” Merritt v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739

 

“Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time,” and “Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. 395 F 2d 906, 910

 

“Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal.” Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp. 478 So. 2D, 368 Fla a DCA 1985)

 

Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist.” Stuck v. Medica1 Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 289

 

“There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction.” Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215

 

“Where jurisdiction is contested, the burden of establishing it rests upon the plaintiff.” Loos v American Energy Savers, Inc., 168 I11.App.3d 558, 522 N.E.2d 841(1988)

 

“the burden of proving jurisdiction rests upon the party asserting it.” Bindell v City of Harvey, 212 I11.App.3d 1042, 571 N.E.2d 1017(1st Dist. 1991)

 

Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.” Lantana v. Hopper,102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York 37 F.Supp. 150

 

  • The Defendant has previously served literally thousands of Notices upon Andrew Vogle, and Steve Myers, who is Pippins predecessor, and their superiors in Texas and Washington, District of Columbia, and England, which is proof that their assault, kidnapping, false imprisonment, and extortion upon and the Defendant, was premeditated, deliberate, calculated, and malicious.

 

  • The Defendant filed a Challenge to jurisdiction by special appearance and these Satanist have not answered one word, or even attempted to prove jurisdiction.

 

  • Havins #259, who is Pippins Satanist order follower PIG forged my signature on his citation in conspiracy with Stutsman, and I filed a Revocation of Signatures.

 

  • In order to prove jurisdiction there MUST be a contract

It is impossible to prove jurisdiction exists absent a substantial nexus with the state, such as voluntary subscription to license.  All jurisdictional facts supporting claim that supposed jurisdiction exists must appear on the record of the court.”  Pipe Line v Marathon. 102 S. Ct. 3858 quoting Crowell v Benson 883 US 22

 

  • No corporation has standing to do anything in any court

“My opinion is and long has been that the mayor and aldermen of a city corporation, or the president and directors of a bank, or the president and directors of a railroad company and of other similar corporations, are the true parties that sue and are sued as trustees and representatives of the constantly changing stockholders…. A corporation, therefore, being not a natural person, but a mere creature of the mind, invisible and intangible, cannot be a citizen of a state, or of the United States, and cannot fall within the terms or the power of the above mentioned article, and can therefore neither plead nor be impleaded in the courts of the United States.” Rundle v Delaware & Raritan Canal Company 55 U.S. 80 (1852) [emphasis added]

 

therefore the real parties of interest in this matter are Havins #259, Pippins, Hudman, Vogel, McClure, Stutsman, Brundrett, Chambers, Jones, Crabtree, Rothenberger, and Barrett.

 

  • Hudman, Vogel, Pippins, Stutsman, and Havins were NOT acting in their official capacity, but were all acting in their private capacity ONLY.

“A judge ceases to set as a judicial officer because the governing principals of administrative law provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony, record, arguments and rationale for that of the agency.  Additionally, courts are prohibited from their substituting their judgments for that of the agency.” AISI v US, 568 F2d 284.

 

“An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government”.  Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp. 94.

 

  • Hudman the clerk masquerading as a Judge committed treason, and a seditious conspiracy with Vogel, Pippins, Stutsman, and Havins pursuant to your federal codes

“When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.“ US v Will, 449 US 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 LEd2nd 392, 406 (1980) Cohens V Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5LEd 257 (1821)

 

“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton vs Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, p. 442

 

“An unconstitutional law is void, and is as no law. An offence created by it is not a crime.” Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371, 376 (1880), quoted with approval in Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 408 (1963)

 

“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” 16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177 late 2nd, Section 256

 

  • When Hudman becomes a Clerk Masquerading as a Judge, he walks away from any immunity he may enjoy, and becomes personally liable

“Judge loses his absolute immunity from damage actions only when he acts in clear absence of all jurisdiction or performance of an act which is not judicial in nature.” Schucker v. Rockwood, 846 F.2d 1202

 

“When enforcing mere statutes, judges of all courts do not act judicially” and thus are not protected by “qualified” or “limited immunity,” SEE: Owen v. City, 445 U.S. 662; Bothke v. Terry, 713 F2d 1404

 

  • The decision in Hudman’s kangaroo so-called court is brutum fulmen

brutum fulmen”:  “An empty noise; an empty threat.  A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no judgment at all, and by which no rights are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone.  Dollert v. Pratt-Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348. Also, see Corpus Juris Secundum, “Judgments”  §§ 499, 512 546, 549. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition.

 

  • Hudman intended to be an accomplice to Pippins, Vogel, and their order followers Havins and Stutsman in my assault, under the color of their so-called law

“Color” means “An appearance, semblance, or simulacrum, as distinguished from that which is real. A prima facia or apparent right. Hence, a deceptive appearance, a plausible, assumed exterior, concealing a lack of reality; a disguise or pretext. See also colorable.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, on page 240.

 

“Colour, color. Signifies a probable plea, but which is in fact false…” Tomlin’s Law Dictionary 1835, Volume 1

 

“Colorable” means “That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit feigned, having the appearance of truth.” Windle v. Flinn, 196 Or.  654, 251 P.2d 136, 146.

 

“Colour of Law – Mere semblance  of a legal right. An action done under colour of law is one done with the apparent authority of law but actually in contravention of law.” Barron’s Dictionary of Canadian Law, Sixth Edition, page 51,

 

“Color of Law” means “The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of

legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state is action taken under ‘color of law.'” Atkins v. Lanning. D.C.Okl., 415 F. Supp. 186, 188.

 

  • Hudman the Clerk masquerading as a Judge knows that it is my right to have a neutral and detached judge, but instead chose to conspire with Vogel and Pippins and thereby participate in a fraud and a nullity;
    1. Hudman presented himself as neutral and unbiased when in actually Hudman was bought and paid for by Pippins, Vogel and Brundrett, and their handler in England, Elizabeth Windsor

“It is a fundamental right of a party to have a neutral and detached judge preside over the judicial proceedings.” Ward v Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 61-62, 93 S.Ct 80, 83, 34 L.Ed. 2d 267 (1972); Tumey v Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 5209, 47 S. Ct. 437, 440, 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927)

 

  1. Hudman knows that King George signed the Definitive Treaty of Peace of 1783 as the King of England and France, and the Arch Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States of America, and Queen Elizabeth is the successor to King George, therefore Hudman is taking orders from that bitch in England (no disrespect to dogs intended), and the Satanist POPE, Inc, in the Vatican, and conspired with these PIGs named herein, in a seditious conspiracy to the Constitution for the United States of America in violation of their own federal codes.

 

  1. They assaulted the Defendant with their corporate codes and statutes and the Defendant has served hundreds of documents on them and their superiors stating that the Defendant is not interested in participating in their satanic commercial transactions, and Hudman is their accomplice

 

  1. They assaulted the Defendant with their criminal corporation

“My opinion is and long has been that the mayor and aldermen of a city corporation, or the president and directors of a bank, or the president and directors of a railroad company and of other similar corporations, are the true parties that sue and are sued as trustees and representatives of the constantly changing stockholders…. A corporation, therefore, being not a natural person, but a mere creature of the mind, invisible and intangible, cannot be a citizen of a state, or of the United States, and cannot fall within the terms or the power of the above mentioned article, and can therefore neither plead nor be impleaded in the courts of the United States.” Rundle v Delaware & Raritan Canal Company 55 U.S. 80 (1852) [emphasis added]

 

and Hudman is their accomplice.

 

  • For all of the foregoing reasons, all of the ORDERs, Judgments, and decisions, in this case, are absolute nullities and void ab initio

“Where there is no jurisdiction there is no judge; the proceeding is as nothing. Such has been the law from the days of the Marshalsea, 10 Coke 68; also Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall 335,351.” Manning v. Ketcham, 58 F.2d 948.

 

“A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect” Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 27,  453 F.2d 645, 14 A.L.R. Fed. 298 (C.A. 1 Mass. 1972).  Hobbs v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management,  485 F.Supp. 456 (M.D. Fla. 1980).

 

“Void judgment is one which has no legal force or effect whatever, it is an absolute nullity, its invalidity may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place and it need not be attacked directly but may be attacked collaterally whenever and wherever it is interposed.”  City of Lufkin v. McVicker,  510 S.W. 2d 141 (Tex. Civ. App. – Beaumont 1973).

 

“A void judgment, insofar as it purports to be pronouncement of  court, is an absolute nullity” Thompson v. Thompson,  238 S.W.2d 218 (Tex.Civ.App. – Waco 1951).

 

“Void order may be attacked, either directly or collaterally, at any time”  In re Estate of Steinfield, 630 N.E.2d 801, certiorari denied, See also Steinfeld v. Hoddick, 513 U.S. 809, (Ill. 1994).

 

“A void judgment is one which, from its inception, is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind the parties or to support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of enforcement in any manner or to any degree.” Loyd v. Director, Dept. of Public Safety, 480 So. 2d 577 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985).

 

“Not every action by any judge is in exercise of his judicial function.  It is not a judicial function for a Judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the Courthouse, when a judge acts as a Trespasser of the Law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject matter jurisdiction and The Judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect”! Yates Vs. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962)

 

and all such judgments and ORDERs are brutum fulmen

brutum fulmen”:  “An empty noise; an empty threat.  A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no judgment at all, and by which no rights are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone.  Dollert v. Pratt-Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348. Also, see Corpus Juris Secundum, “Judgments”  §§ 499, 512 546, 549. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition

 

  • Hudman intended to be a bought and paid for Clerks masquerading as a Judge held a show-trial in his kangaroo court

“Kangaroo court. Term descriptive of a sham legal proceeding in which a person’s rights are totally disregarded and in which the result is a foregone conclusion because of the bias of the court or other tribunal.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 868,

 

  • PIG is an acronym which stands for “Persons In Government who intend to perjure their oaths.”

 

  • Everything they do is a fraud

“Once a fraud, always a fraud.” 13 Vin. Abr. 539.

 

“Things invalid from the beginning cannot be made valid by subsequent act.” Trayner, Max. 482. Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862

 

“A thing void in the beginning does not become valid by lapse of time.” 1 S. & R. 58.  Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1866

 

Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin. Dig. 50, 17, 29; Broom, Max. 178, Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862,

 

“Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom’s Max. 349.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856,

 

and any act by any government official, to conceal the fraud becomes an act of fraud;

“fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law 1856

 

and fraud is inexcusable and unpardonable;

“Fraus et dolus nemini patrocianari debent. Fraud and deceit should excuse no man. 3 Co. 78.” Bouvier’s Maxims  of Law 1856

 

and any fraud amounts to injustice;

“Fraus et jus nunquam cohabitant. Fraud and justice never dwell together.” Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th Edition, page 1832

 

“Quod alias bonum et justum est, si per vim vei fraudem petatur, malum et injustum efficitur. What is otherwise good and just, if sought by force or fraud, becomes bad and unjust. 3 Co. 78.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856

 

everything these City of Azle PIGs do is a fraud and a lie, and they get their Satanist BAAL priests like Vogel, and Hudman to help them with their assaults, kidnappings, false imprisonments, and thefts

“Fraud and deceit may arise from silence where there is a duty to speak the truth, as well as from speaking an untruth.” Morrison v Acton, 198 P.2d 590, 68 Ariz. 27 (1948)

 

“Fraud” may be committed by a failure to speak when the duty of speaking is imposed as much as by speaking falsely.” Batty v Arizona State Dental Board, 112 P.2d 870, 57 Ariz. 239. (1941).

 

and these City of Azle PIGs, as well as Hudman, Vogel, and Brundrett are all satanic children of the devil

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” John 8:44

 

and their judgment day is coming

“…I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, [or Christians] and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” Revelations 2:9

 

“But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers [pharmaceutical drug pushers], and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” Revelations 21:8

 

  • Havins #259, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Andrew Vogel, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Douglas R. Hudman, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Rick Pippins, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • David McClure, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Steve Stutsman, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Alan Brundrett, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • William Chambers, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Bill Jones, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Paul Crabtree, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Rouel Rothenberger, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Lee Barrett, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and any witnesses who read this document, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you and we will be talking about this on judgment day, satanist! (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5)

 

  • Greg Abbott, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  • Ken Paxton, before God, Angels, and these witnesses below, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  • This Declaration is sealed pursuant to locus sigilli

“locus sigilli – The place of the seal. Today this phrase is almost always abbreviated “L.S.” ” Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1026.

 

Signed and sealed in red ink on the land, under penalties with perjury.

 

I, Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, Sui Juris, a natural man of the republic, living in the republic, a common man, does declare that I have scribed and read the foregoing facts, and in accordance with the best of my firsthand knowledge, such are true, correct, complete and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, before God, Angels, and everybody who reads this document as witnesses, and pursuant to your rules of evidence.

 

This Declaration is dated this ______________ day of June in the year, two thousand and sixteen.

 

 

______________________________________________L. S.

Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, sui juris

sovereign living soul, holder of the office of “the people”

Judicial Power Citizen by right of blood

a man, Inhabitant of the land

With full responsibility for My actions

under YHWH’s law as found in the Holy Bible and no other

With a postal address of;

Non-Domestic Mail

C/O 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas

ZIP CODE EXEMPT

 

Name                                            Location                                              Signature

 

_______________________        _____________________________  _______________________

 

 

_______________________        _____________________________  _______________________

 

 

_______________________        _____________________________  _______________________

 

 

_______________________        _____________________________  _______________________

 

 

_______________________        _____________________________  _______________________

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Revocation of Signatures

 

Azle Municipal Court

_________________________________________________________________

CAUSE NUMBER A023735

STATE OF TEXAS, INC.

VS.

GLENN W FEARN

_________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF ALL SIGNATURES BY DECLARATION

Served By Registered Mail RR 569 489 410 US

_________________________________________________________________

  1. The Supreme Court of the United States of America has MANDATED:

“a (private) citizen does not waive a right, unless HE DOES SO KNOWLINGLY AND WITH FULL APPRECIATION OF ALL CIRCUMSTANCES THEREOF”. (Brady v. U.S,  397 U.S. 742.748)

 

  1. The intent and meaning of the term “right(s)” as used by the Courts, to be inclusive of, but not limited to, first and foremost unalienable rights, and secondly all other rights, i.e. “civil rights”, “statutory rights:, “legal rights”, “lawful rights”, “substantive rights”, or rights by any other nomenclature, and I have not ever, knowingly and with full appreciation of all circumstances thereof; conveyed, consented, bargained, sold or waived my unalienable rights or rights by any other nomenclature.

 

  1. I have not ever, knowingly and with full appreciation of all circumstances thereof: become “surety” for debts, liabilities, obligations, compelled performance, and/or bankruptcy for any entity, fictional or real, by any name or nomenclature.

 

  1. My signature that may appear on any and all instruments, documents, forms, or other named piece of paper, that gives rise to the presumption of Public Policy / Commerce / Admiralty / Maritime Jurisdiction or Jurisdiction of any other nature not found in a competent Court of Law of proper jurisdiction, or that gives rise to presumption of consent to incur liabilities, obligations or debts in sums of money or property alleged to be due and owing to any entity, inclusive of, but not limited to; International Entities or Federal/State/Local Governments or Public/Private Corporations or entities by any other name or nomenclature, are hereby rescinded and revoked, for good and just cause, ab initio, nunct pro tunct.

 

  1. The City of Azle order follower Satanist Havins #259, (hereinafter PIG – Persons In Government who intend to perjure their oaths) in conspiracy with Stutsman #220, assaulted me, kidnapped me, falsely imprisoned me and engaged in the theft of my property, with their extortion racket, and then held a show-trial in their kangaroo so-called court, before their (bought and paid for) Clerk masquerading as a Judge, Hudman, who forged my signature, and then issued a void judgment, all of which in furtherance of their satanic law merchant so-called contract, based on fraud, deception, coercion, intimidation, assault, kidnapping, false imprisonment, theft, and extortion, all of which was aided and abetted by the satanist order followers Pippins, and Vogle, and Brundrett is the ringleader.

 

  1. All signatures are hereby revoked and rescinded in this case including but not limited to, all signatures when dealing with the City of Azle order follower Satanist Havins, all signatures in their kangaroo so-called court show-trial.

All unconscionable contracts are subject to rescission under the common law for failure to make the proper disclosures in order to constitute an acceptance, where there is no meeting of the minds there is no contract as set forth in In re Maxwell v. Fairbanks Capital Corporation, 281 B.R. 101, (2002); Bankr.Lexis 759.

 

  1. This NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF ALL SIGNATURES BY DECLARATION Instrument is binding on all entities, by any name or nomenclature, until a real and true controverting party, by judicial initiative in a Court of Law with proper jurisdiction, produces true and real evidence to lawfully controvert EVERY element of this instrument.

 

  1. Everything they did and do is a fraud,
  2. a) Havins in conspiracy with Stutsman conspired together to forge my signature on their citation under their satanic Law Merchant Uniform Commercial Code, by inserting “refused”;

 

  1. b) They criminally convert my appellation into a cestui que trust under their satanic Roman law

 

  1. c) they criminally convert my postal address from the land of Texas to their foreign United Nations corporation with the use of a ZIP CODE;

 

  1. d) they assaulted me with their corporate commercial codes, rules, and regulations when I have served them, and their superiors with notice, hundreds of times, that I am not interested in their satanic commercial transactions

 

  1. e) They assaulted me with their criminal corporation STATE OF TEXAS, INC.

“My opinion is and long has been that the mayor and aldermen of a city corporation, or the president and directors of a bank, or the president and directors of a railroad company and of other similar corporations, are the true parties that sue and are sued as trustees and representatives of the constantly changing stockholders…. A corporation, therefore, being not a natural person, but a mere creature of the mind, invisible and intangible, cannot be a citizen of a state, or of the United States, and cannot fall within the terms or the power of the above mentioned article, and can therefore neither plead nor be impleaded in the courts of the United States.” Rundle v Delaware & Raritan Canal Company 55 U.S. 80 (1852) [emphasis added]

 

  1. f) They put on a show trial, with Hudman, a (bought and paid for) clerk masquerading as a Judge in their kangaroo court, all of which is based on hearsay evidence, and based on presumptions taken in their military dictatorship, when they each know that I am entitled to a neutral and detached judge in any judicial proceeding

“It is a fundamental right of a party to have a neutral and detached judge preside over the judicial proceedings.” Ward v Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 61-62, 93 S.Ct 80, 83, 34 L.Ed. 2d 267 (1972); Tumey v Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 5209, 47 S. Ct. 437, 440, 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927)

 

which means that they are assaulting me with their unconstitutional Bill of Attainder

“Bill of Attainder” means Legislative actsno matter what their formthat apply either to named individuals or to easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to inflict punishment on them without a judicial trial. United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 448-49, 85 S. Ct.  1707, 1715, 14 L.Ed. 484, 492; United States v. Lovett,    328  U.S.  303, 315,  66 S.Ct.  1073, 1079, 90 L.Ed. 1252.

 

“bill of attainder. 2. A special legislative act prescribing punishment, without a trial, for a specific person or group. • Bills of attainder are prohibited by the U.S. Constitution (art. I, § 9, cl. 3; art. I, § 10, cl. 1). — Also termed act of attainder. See ATTAINDER; BILL OF PAINS AND PENALTIES . [Cases: Constitutional Law 82.5. C.J.S. Constitutional Law §§ 429–431.]” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition, page 496

 

“BILL OF PAINS AND PENALTIES bill of pains and penalties. A legislative act that, though similar to a bill of attainder, prescribes punishment less severe than capital punishment. • Bills of pains and penalties are included within the U.S. Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. U.S. Const. art I, § 9. [Cases: Constitutional Law 82.5. C.J.S. Constitutional Law §§ 429–431.]” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition, page 499

 

  1. g) Their order follower Satanist Clerk masquerading as a Judge forged my signature onto their satanic so-called contracts, with the objective to sell me into slavery

 

  1. h) Without even attempting to prove jurisdiction, that I challenged by special appearance, they made a void judgment and issued a fraudulent fictitious warrant that was a nullity, so their order follower Satanists could become accomplices

“Once a fraud, always a fraud.” 13 Vin. Abr. 539.

 

“Things invalid from the beginning cannot be made valid by subsequent act.” Trayner, Max. 482. Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862

 

“A thing void in the beginning does not become valid by lapse of time.” 1 S. & R. 58.  Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1866

 

Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin. Dig. 50, 17, 29; Broom, Max. 178, Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862,

 

“Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom’s Max. 349.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856,

 

and any act by any government official to conceal the fraud becomes an act of fraud;

“fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law 1856

 

and fraud is inexcusable and unpardonable;

“Fraus et dolus nemini patrocianari debent. Fraud and deceit should excuse no man. 3 Co. 78.” Bouvier’s Maxims  of Law 1856

 

and any fraud amounts to injustice;

“Fraus et jus nunquam cohabitant. Fraud and justice never dwell together.” Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th Edition, page 1832

 

“Quod alias bonum et justum est, si per vim vei fraudem petatur, malum et injustum efficitur. What is otherwise good and just, if sought by force or fraud, becomes bad and unjust. 3 Co. 78.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856.

 

and as liars, they are all Satanists categorized with murderers

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” John 8:44

 

“But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers [pharmaceutical drug pushers], and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” Revelations 21:8

 

and their judgment day is coming

“And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise

of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.” 2 Peter 2:3

 

and because the people of Texas are allowing this evil to exist, they are reaping and will continue to reap the judgments of God

“If a man be found stealing any of his brethren of the children of Israel, and maketh merchandise of him, or selleth him; then that thief shall die; and thou shalt put evil away from among you.” Deuteronomy 24:7

 

  1. Havins, #259, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Stuttsman, #220, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Rick Pippins, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Douglas R Hudman, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist

 

  1. Andrew Vogle, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Alan Brundrett, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. David McClure, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. William Chambers, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Bill Jones, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Paul Crabtree, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Raoul Rothenberger, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Lee Barrett, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Greg Abbott, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Ken Paxton, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Loretta Lynch, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

  1. Barak Obama, before God, Angels, and everyone who reads this document as witnesses, I shake the dust of the earth from off my feet against you (Matt 10:14, Mark 6:11, Luke 9:5) and we will be talking about this on judgment day Satanist!

 

This Declaration is signed and sealed in red ink on the land, this __________________ day of May, in the year two thousand and sixteen, pursuant to locus sigilli, under the “written authority” of the Word of God and in the Name (Col. 3:17) of YHWH, before God, angels, and these witnesses.

 

_____________________________________________­­­­L.S.

Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, a man

c/o 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas

ZIP CODE EXEMPT

 

 

 

We the undersigned witnesses hereby verify that we witnessed the signature of Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, the man

 

Name                                                  location                                                signature

______________________                ____________________        _____________________

______________________                ____________________        _____________________

______________________                ____________________        _____________________

______________________                ____________________        _____________________

______________________                ____________________        _____________________

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

US Marshall PIGs

Check out my latest video about the US Marshal PIGs. The US Marshal PIGs, and US Border PIGs are the terrorists fabricating hearsay evidence, lies and inuendo, all of which is designed to deny due process, deny your right to pursue happiness by getting compensation for labor, and deny any other rights you may think you have. They are satanists and cowards engaging in a covert warfare, so they can “keep safe”, and yet cause as much harm and injury to others as possible. They drag you into their kangaroo so-called court with a bought and paid for Clerk masquerading as a Judge (whore), so they can further deny due process, and hold a show trial, with their forced satanic BAR member representation.
 
You are now a watchman
 
“But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand.” Ezekiel 33:6
 
Either you are part of the problem, or part of the solution. Which is it?
 
Please circulate this far and wide!!
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Do You Really Own Your Land?

Do you own your land? If you are paying a yearly rent (property taxes) then you have a feudal title, and you are a serf on the land that you do not own. If you do not pay the taxes, they sell it from under you, and do an Unlawful Detainder action, which is used to evict tenants.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

All State Statutes are Actually Federal

All State Statutes involving Transportation, Financial Institutions, Educational Institutions, Healthcare Institutions, Taxation, and municipal corporations (governments) are actually US statutes. All of this is coming from the United Nations, the Crown and the Vatican. It is all full of fraud and satanic.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment