July 2017 M T W T F S S « May 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Last fall I was stopped by the Walker County Sheriff’s for a burned out third brake light bulb and the PIGs had me in hand cuffs at the side of the freeway for almost an hour. I did a video about it, and am preparing a lawsuit. Anyway, somebody on my group, who I know, and who I know is “like minded” was recently stopped by the Walker County Sheriffs and they were very interested in what he had to say. His comments are pasted below:
RULES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND MARITIME CLAIMS RULES C(6)
In the matters for commerce, All commerce operated in truth, demand for truth is made by all party for full disclosure=who are you? Who do you represent and who is the real party of interest? Is the real party of interest the Commonwealth for Britain, the British Crown, the Queen for England, the Holy See? Is the United States flying the Queen’s Banner Flag? What city does the Flag in the United States and State Court Houses, the House and the Senate, State and Federal and the oval office’s State and Federal represent? Have you desecrated our Flag for Liberty old Glory the lawful Flag for the United States defined by 4 USC J~
Verified Declaration in the Nature by an Affidavit for Truth in Commerce and Contract by Waiver for Tort Presented by I, me, my, myself, addressee, Jack Rabbit Patriot, living soul, one for We the People under Original Common Law Jurisdiction by the Texas and united states of America Contracts, the Constitutions.
Republic and one by the )
several united states ) ss
in America )
For: Whom it may concern: In the Matter for JACK RABBIT PATRIOT; JACK R. PATRIOT; Jack R. Patriot (and all derivatives thereof) and other issues described below:
I, Me, My, Myself, addressee, Jack Rabbit; house of Patriot, (herein after Title Owner) the undersigned for one We the People, Sovereign, natural born living souls, the Posterity, born upon the land in the one for several counties within the one for the several states united for America, the undersigned Posterity, Creditors, Claimants and Secured Party, herein after “I, Me, My, Myself, Title Owner” do hereby solemnly declare, say and state:
Plain Statement of Facts
A matter must be expressed for being resolved. In commerce, truth is sovereign. Truth is expressed in the form for an Affidavit.
An Affidavit not rebutted stands as Truth in commerce. An Affidavit not rebutted, after thirty (30) days, becomes the judgment in commerce. A Truth Affidavit, under commercial law, can only be satisfied: by Truth Affidavit rebuttal, by payment, by agreement, by resolution, or by Common Law Rules, by a jury.
I, Me, My, Myself, the Title Owner, am expressing truth by this Verified Declaration in the Nature for an Affidavit of Truth in Commerce and Contract by Waiver for Tort Presented by me, addressee, Title Owner, living soul, one for We the People under Original Common Law Jurisdiction for the Arizona and United States of America Contracts, the Constitutions.
WHEREAS, the public record is the highest evidence form, I, Me, My, Myself, Title Owner, am hereby timely creating public record by Declaration with this Verified Declaration in the Nature for a Truth Affidavit in Commerce and Contract for a Tort Waiver Presented by Me, addressee, living soul, the Title Owner, one for under We the People under Original Common Law Jurisdiction for the Arizona and United States of America Contracts, the Constitutions.
contract with me and with the Secretary under State of Texas is My recorded copyright Fiction by this
declaration under original common law jurisdiction for one-hundred (100) years and is My private
property, the Secured Party, for My Estate protection, My Life, and My Liberty. This Truth Affidavit of
Copyright is nunc pro tunc to the ______ day of ______________, in the year XXXX, for Me, Fourteenth day of _______________
I, Me, My, Myself, the Title Owner, am not an expert in the Law, however I do know right from wrong. If there is any human being that is being unjustly damaged by any statements herein, if he/she will inform me by facts, I will sincerely make every effort and amend my ways.
I, Me, My, Myself, the Title Owner, hereby and herein reserve the right for amending and make amendment for this document as necessary in order that the truth may be ascertained and proceeding justly determined.
If any living soul has information that will controvert and overcome this Declaration, since this is a commercial matter, please advise me IN WRITING by DECLARATION/AFFIDAVIT FORM within ten (10) days from recording hereof, providing me with your counter Declaration/Affidavit, proving with particularity by stating all requisite actual evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law, and not merely the ultimate facts and law conclusions, that this affidavit by Declaration is substantially and materially false sufficiently for changing materially my or the Fiction’s status and factual declaration.
Your silence stands as consent, and tacit approval, for the factual declarations here being established as fact as a law matter and this affidavit by Declaration will stand as final judgment in this matter; and for the sum certain herein stated and will be in full force and effect against all party, due and payable and enforceable by law.
The criminal penalties for commercial fraud are determined by jury, by law, the monetary value is set by me for violation against my rights, for breaching the law, the contract, the Constitutions in the sum certain amount as stated herein for dollars specie silver coin lawful money for the United States of America as defined by Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, under the Constitution, by We the People for the United States and will be due and payable on the eleventh day or any day thereafter as use occurs after filing by Me, in the public records for xxxxxx County, Arizona, under this declaration.
The Undersigned, I, Me, My, Myself, the Title Owner, holder in due course for original, do herewith declare, state and say that I, Secured Party, issue this with sincere intent in truth, that I, Me, the undersigned Secured Party, am competent by stating the matters set forth herein, that the contents are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, reasonable, not misleading, and by My best knowledge, by me undersigned addressee.
Under the laws of the united States of America, this NOTICE is made under the penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 USC 1746(1), WITHOUT the UNITED STATES.
Notice for the principal is notice for the agent and notice for the agent is notice for the principal.
Notice for the county clerk for the county Pinal, Arizona and record court for original jurisdiction, is notice for all.
I sign this document on this date, nunc pro tunc to the date, of the ________ day of _________________, in the year _______, the date of the creation of the first of the FICTION(S).
Addressee signature, holder in due course, the Title owner
Without Recourse, All rights Reserved
c/o 9999 E. Florence Blvd., #9999
Casa Grande, Arizona
Jack Rabbit; house of Patriot
Addressee, Title owner
Using a notary on this document does not constitute any adhesion, nor does it alter my status in any manner. The purpose for notary is verification and identification only and not for entrance into any foreign jurisdiction, a benefit for the Pagans and Heathens so they whom I pray may become knowledgeable in the truth for the Law by our Holy Father in Heaven and repent, so they will no longer be alienated from their true God, Yahweh.
Pinal county ]
Arizona state ]
Having witnessed the signing and sealing of the forgoing Verified Declaration by Jack Rabbit; house of Patriot, I place my hand and seal hereon as an authentic act as a Notary Public.
Subscribed and affirmed before me this _____ day for the __________ month in the year of our Lord and Savior, Two Thousand and XXXXXXX, A.D.
Dismissed both charges or tickets without prejudice after talking to the county attorney lol I don’t think he wanted to challenge me in trial I didn’t have to use jurisdiction and after raising our voices at one another and me telling him to calm down the officer forgetting bout court and the officer only living three blocks from city hall but not wanting to walk over to show up for trial he the county attorney dismissed without prejudice . so man thanks for you’re time I greatly appreciate it and let me know if there is anything I can do to help in anyway . I will be referreing you to some other friends of mine if this is ok let me know if not I’ll just assume it is. Thanks again .
Corporate Denial Affidavit
Arizona republic )
) Subscribed, Sworn, Sealed
Pinal County )
I, Me, My, or Myself, also known as Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, having been duly put under oath, I do affirm, depose, and being cognizant of the penalties for bearing false witness, do say;
stated herein, and further,
“(a) Entity names may consist of letters of the Roman alphabet, Arabic numerals, and certain symbols capable of being reproduced on a standard English language typewriter, or combination thereof.
(b) Only upper case or capitol letters, with no distinction as to type face or font, will be recognized.” Texas Administrative Code § 79.31. Corporations – Characters of Print Acceptable in Names
and any evidence of any such entity is hearsay evidence and a fraud;
“An allegation that a corporation is incorporated shall be taken as true, unless denied by the affidavit of the adverse party, his agent or attorney, whether such corporation is a public or private corporation and however created.”
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52
“Failure of any adverse party to deny under oath allegation that party is a corporation dispenses with necessity of proof of that fact.”
Galleria Bank v. Southwest Properties, Inc. ( Civ.App. 1973) 498 S.W.2d 5.,
When the complaint is lodged by the Government for a fine, fee or a tax, all of which are revenue, they are imposed only on Corporations. See Colonial Pipe Line Co. v. Triagle, 421 US 100 (1975),
if Respondent is not a Corporation he cannot appear and plead. See West Union Tel. Co. v Eyser, 2 Colo. 141; Greenwood v. Railroad Co., 123 Mass. 32; Foster v. white Cloud, 32 Mo. 505; Hobich v. Folger, 20 Wall. 1; Boyce v M.E. Church, 43 Md. 359; Folsom v. Star Union Etc. Freight Line, 54 Iowa 490,
“(a) The term “person” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 3797 of title 26.
(b) The term “sales or use tax” means any tax levied on, with respect to, or measured by, sales, receipts from sales, purchases, storage, or use of tangible personal property, except a tax with respect to which the provisions of section 104 of this title are applicable.
(c) The term “income tax” means any tax levied on, with respect to, or measured by, net income, gross income, or gross receipts.
(d) The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the United States.
(e) The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency, of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State.” 4 USC § 110 Definitions [emphasis added]
“(12) Taxing jurisdiction.— The term “taxing jurisdiction” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, or any territory or possession of the United States, any municipality, city, county, township, parish, transportation district, or assessment jurisdiction, or any other political subdivision within the territorial limits of the United States with the authority to impose a tax, charge, or fee.” 4 USC § 124 Definitions [emphasis added], and further,
“Whoever falsely and willfully represents himself to be a citizen of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.” 18 USC § 911,
and even though I can prove I am not a “whoever”, I do NOT bear false witness, therefore I cannot say I am a US citizen, and further,
“By metaphysical refinement in examining the form of our government it might be correctly said that there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States.
A citizen of any one of the States of the Union is held to be and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing.
To conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea, and inconsistent with the proper construction and common understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution, which must be deduced from its various other provisions. The object then to be attained, by the exercise of the power of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective States.
At the time of the adoption of the Constitution the States had power to make citizens of aliens.
If we examine the language closely, and according to the rules of rigid construction always applicable to delegated powers, we will find that the power to naturalize in fact is not given to Congress, but simply the power to establish an uniform rule.
The States had the power to naturalize foreigners, and there was no necessity for this power to be surrendered to the General Government.
Hence the necessity arose, not that Congress should have power to naturalize, but should have power to prescribe to the States a rule to be carried out by them, and which should be uniform in each. If this were not so, it follows conclusively that there is no mode by which a foreigner can be made expressly citizen of a State, for I have already shown there is no such thing, technically, as a citizen of the United States.
It follows, that as it is only the citizens of the State who are entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States, is left alone to the action of Congress through her federal tribunals; and in the form which they have adopted, then a distinction both in rights and privileges is made to exist between citizens of the United States ex vi termini, and citizens of the respective States.
To the former no privileges or immunities are granted; and it will hardly be contended that political status can be derived by implication against express legal enactments.
Governed by this rule, I have no hesitation in saying that the Act in question is equivalent to a direct and palpable declaration by the Legislature which enacted it, that it recognized the rule of naturalization prescribed for the States by Congress, and determined that the Courts of this State of competent jurisdiction, should be vested with the power of carrying it out.
If this were not so, there was no reason whatever for passing the Act, and Courts cannot decide an Act to be inoperative where a substantial meaning and design can be drawn from its expressions.” Ex Parte Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. Rep. 300, [emphasis added]
“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873), [emphasis added],
“FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. The Fourteenth Amendment of the constitution of the United States. It became a part of the organic law July 28, 1868, and its importance entitles it to special mention. It creates or at least recognizes for the first time a citizenship of the United States, as distinct from that of the states;”
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition, page 785
“Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, ratified in 1868, creates or at least recognizes for the first time a citizenship of the United States, as distinct from that of the states;…”
Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition page 591 [emphasis added]
“Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, ratified in 1868, creates or at least recognizes for the first time a citizenship of the United States, as distinct from that of the states;”
Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition page 657 [emphasis added],
a US citizen is a fiction of law
“fiction of law; An assumption or supposition of law that something which is or may be false is true, or that a state of facts exist which has never really taken place. An assumption, for purposes of justice, of a fact that does not or may not exist. A rule of law, which assumes as true,…, something that is false, but not impossible.”
Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition
“A fiction is a rule of law that assumes something that is or may be false is true.”
Hibbert v Smith, 67 Cal. 547,
and they are using that fiction of law to facilitate the violation of My rights under the color of law,
“Fictitious. Founded on a fiction; having the character of a fiction; pretended; counterfeit. Feigned, imaginary, not real, false, not genuine, nonexistent. Arbitrarily invented and set up, to accomplish an ulterior object.”
Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition, page 624 [emphasis added]
and I can be a national without being a citizen;
“national of the United States. A citizen of the United States or a noncitizen who owes
permanent allegiance to the United States. 8 USCA § 1101(a)(22). — Also termed U.S. national; U.S. citizen.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition, page 3248,
“SUBJECT, NATIONAL: CITIZEN may indicate being a member of a sovereign state, especially one showing democratic forms and usages, owing it allegiance, sharing in individual political rights. SUBJECT may imply a state of subjection to a person, such as a monarch, without much sense of membership in a political community or sharing in political rights. NATIONAL a more general word, may apply to anyone owing permanent allegiance to a nation and indicates one belonging to a broad category that includes both people who are legally citizens or subjects and also people who have not attained such legal status.” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, MERRIAM-WEBSTER INC., Publishers 1986,
and the US Passport application form even talks about a “non-citizen national” in several places;
“I declare under penalty of perjury all of the following; 1) I am a citizen or non-citizen national of the United States…” US Passport application Form DS-11 12-2010 page 1 of 2 [emphasis added],
and the Constitution for the United States of America even talks about state citizenship;
“The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all of the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.” Article IV § 2, Clause 1, Constitution for the United States of America
and the phrase “citizens in the several states” is another way of saying citizens of the United States, and the so-called Fourteenth Amendment does not affect “we the people”
“The (14th) amendment referred to slavery. Consequently, the only persons embraced by its provisions, and for which Congress was authorized to legislate in the manner were those then in slavery.” Bowling v. Commonwealth, (1867), 65 Kent. Rep. 5, 29.
“No white person born within the limits of the United States and subject to their jurisdiction, or born without those limits and subsequently naturalized under their laws, owes his status of citizenship to the recent amendments to the Federal Constitution.” Van Valkenburg v. Brown, 43 Cal 43
“The rights of (original judicial) Citizens of the States, as such, are not under consideration in the fourteenth amendment. They stand as they did before the fourteenth amendment, and are fully guaranteed under other provisions.” United States v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829, 930 (1873).
“The persons declared to be citizens are, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction of thereof.” The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject…”
Elk v Wilkins, 112 US 94, 101, 102, (1884) [Emphasis added]
“…that there was a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of the states, which were distinct from each other, depending upon different characteristics and circumstances in the individual; that it was only privileges and immunities of the citizens of the United States that were placed by the amendment under the protection of the Federal Constitution, and that the privileges and immunities of a citizen of a state, whatever they might be, were not intended to have any additional protection by the paragraph in question, but they must rest for their security and protection where they have heretofore rested.” Maxwell v Dow, 20 S.C.R. 448, at pg 451; [emphasis added],
“Privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship. 14,§ 1.”
Jones v Temmer, 829 F.Supp. 1226 (D.Colo. 1993), and further,
“Among these unalienable rights, as proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is meant, the right any lawful business or vocation, in any manner not inconsistent with the equal rights of others, which may increase their prosperity or develop their faculties, so as to give them their highest enjoyment…It has been well said that, the property which every man has is his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property so it is the most sacred and inviolable...“ Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746 (1883)
“The property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of the poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his own hands, and to hinder his employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property.“
Butchers Union Co. vs. Crescent City Co. 111 U.S. 764.
“The right to follow any of the common occupations of life is an inalienable right. It was formulated as such under the phrase ‘pursuit of happiness’ in the Declaration of Independence.” Allgeyer vs. State of Louisiana, 165 U.S. 578, 17 S.Ct. 427, 4l L. Ed. 832 (1897) Hotel et al. vs. Longley, et al. 160 S.W. 2d. 124, 127 (1942)
“Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,-‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;’ and to ‘secure,’ not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted. That property which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of. . .” Budd v. People of State of New York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892)
“The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579
and My labor is NOT an article of commerce as affirmed by the color of law United States Code;
“The labor of a human being is not a commodity or an article of commerce” 15 USC § 17, and further,
“…includes only the power to amend any section in such a manner that such Amendment, if approved, would be complete within itself, relate to one subject and not substantially affect any other section of Articles of the Constitution or require further Amendments to the Constitution to accomplish its purpose.”
Adams v Gunter, 238 So.2d 824,
and a revision affects many parts of a document;
“. . . the wide and diverse range of subject matters proposed to be voted upon, and the revisional effect which it would necessarily have on our basic plan of government. The proposal is offered as a single amendment but it obviously is multifarious. It does not give the people an opportunity to express approval or disapproval severally as to each major change suggested. . . .” McFadden v Jordan, 196 P.2d 787 [emphasis added],
therefore the so-called Fourteenth Amendment is actually a revision because it changes many things in the Constitution, including property rights, citizenship, taxes, apportionment, the debt, and more,
THE NON-RATIFICATION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, in the case (Dyett v. Turner, 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403 ), Judge AH Ellett of the Utah Supreme Court
and Congress may ONLY amend the Constitution, does not have the authority to revise the constitution,
“The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification maybe proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.” Constitution for the United States of America, Article V
therefore the so-called Fourteenth Amendment is a fraud and a nullity, and the US citizen that it creates, is also a fraud, and a nullity;
“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton vs Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, p. 442
“absolute nullity. Civil law. 1. An act that is void because it is against public policy, law, or order. • The nullity is noncurable. It may be invoked by any party or by the court. See La. Civ. Code arts 7, 2030. 2. The state of such a nullity.” Black’s Law Dictionary 8th Edition, p 3391, and further,
“The dissenting opinion asserts that “The Fourteenth Amendment is a part of the Constitution of the United States.” While this same assertion has been made by The United States Supreme Court, that court has never held that the amendment was legally adopted. I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its faculties could honestly hold that the amendment was properly approved and adopted.”
State v Phillips 540 Pac. Rep.2d 936, [emphasis added], and further,
and a sovereign is not a “person” in a legal sense and as far as a statute is concerned;
Will v Michigan State Police, 491 US 58, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45, 109 S.Ct. 2304, and,
and a US citizen is a “person”;
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…” (so-called) Fourteenth Amendment, Article 1 [emphasis added], and further,
“Once a fraud, always a fraud.” 13 Vin. Abr. 539.
“Things invalid from the beginning cannot be made valid by subsequent act.”
Trayner, Max. 482. Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862
“A thing void in the beginning does not become valid by lapse of time.”
1 S. & R. 58. Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1866
Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin. Dig. 50, 17, 29; Broom, Max. 178, Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862, and further,
“As we have said, the Federal Personal Income Tax is Collected under a Military Venue within a Martial-Law jurisdiction. Federal Reserve Notes are Military Scrip circulated within a Military Venue. The problem is the people don’t understand how the entire United States is covered by a Military Venue…. Under the Social Security Act, there was brought into existence Ten Federal Regional Areas. These ten federal regional areas are the same as a military base. It is not unconstitutional to circulate “military scrip” on a military base as the base is considered to be a military venue. “Military scrip” cannot circulate in the civil jurisdiction of the several States. To get around this Constitutional bar, the Congress (via the Social Security Act), created Ten Military Venues, called Federal Regional Areas. The problem the Congress realized was, while Congress could restructure the Government agencies into these Federal Regional Areas, the people could not be identified to be within this Military Venue but by their own consent. The solution was to create another Military Venue which would trick the people to voluntarily accept recognition that they are within a Military Venue. Congress solved this problem by creating the ZIP CODE. The “zip code” divides the United States into Ten Military Venues called “National Areas.” When a Citizen receives mail from an agency of the federal government (such as the I.R.S.), in the return address of the federal agency is the district within the regional area the letter is sent from, and on the address of the “Citizen” it was sent to is the national area [ZIP] in which he received the correspondence from the I.R.S.. In other words, the correspondence was sent from one of the federal regional areas [military venue] to one of the National Areas [another military venue]. “Taxing Districts” are established within one of the Federal Regional Areas, which places the collection of taxes under a martial law jurisdiction.” Dyett v Turner 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403  The Non-Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment by Assistant Director A.H. Ellett, Utah Supreme Court [Emphasis added],
“Sec. 15. As used in this Act the term “United States” means the Government of the United States…the term “currency of the United States” means currency which is legal tender in the United States, and includes United States notes,…Federal Reserve Notes…” Gold Reserve Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 337, and further,
“1. ZIP Codes are required on Express Mail, Pre-sorted and automation price First Class Mail, periodicals mail, Standard Mail, Package Services mail (except single piece price parcel post), all mail sent to military addresses within the United States and to APO and FPO addresses, all official mail (penalty mail), all business reply mail, and all merchandise return service mail.
“(1) If executed without the United States: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date).(Signature)”.
(2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date).(Signature)”.” 28 USC § 1746 [emphasis added]
“The governments are but trustees acting under derived authority and have no power to delegate what is not delegated to them. But the people, as the original fountain might take away what they have delegated and entrust to whom they please. … The sovereignty in every state resides in the people of the state and they may alter and change their form of government at their own pleasure.”
Luther v. Borden, 48 US 1, 12 Led 581
“A delegate cannot delegate; an agent cannot delegate his functions to a subagent without the knowledge or consent of the principal; the person to whom an office or duty is delegated cannot lawfully devolve the duty on another, unless he be expressly authorized so to do.”
9 Coke, 77; Broom, Max. 840; 2 Kent, Comm. 633; 2 Steph. Comm. 119 [emphasis added]
“A delegated power cannot be again delegated.”
2 Inst. 597; Black’s, 2d. 347; 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1300
“A deputy cannot have (or appoint) a deputy.”
Story, Ag. s.13; 9 Coke, 77; 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1936
“To establish Post Offices and post Roads; Constitution for the United States of America, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 7
Non Domestic Mail
C/O 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437
Fort Worth, Texas
Zip Code Exempt
(DMM 602.1.3.e.2, 18 USC § 1342) Ezekiel 33:1-10
and I shall not accept anything incorrectly addressed, with a ZIP CODE, or spelled in any way NOT as indicated herein,
“The following definitions apply unless the statute or context in which the word or phrase is used requires a different definition:
(7) “State,” when referring to a part of the United States, includes any state, district, commonwealth, territory, and insular possession of the United States and any area subject to the legislative authority of the United States of America.
(9) “United States” includes a department, bureau, or other agency of the United States of America.” Texas Government Code Section 311.005 General Definitions [emphasis added]
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” – Preamble, Constitution for the United States of America
“CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The fundamental law of the United States. 2. It was framed by a convention of the representatives of the people, who met at Philadelphia, and finally adopted it on the 17th day of September, 1787. It became the law of the land on the first Wednesday in March, 1789. 5 Wheat. 420.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 Edition, page 295 [emphasis added]
and the Constitution for the United States of America is the supreme law of the land;
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” Constitution for the United States of America, Article 6, Clause 2
and United States is a federal corporation that was created by Congress in 1871, therefore it is NOT the United States that is talked about in the Constitution for the United States of America;
“As used in this chapter:
(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.” 28 USC § 3002 Definitions [emphasis added]
therefore the United States is an unconstitutional agency of the United States of America, and all agencies of the United States, that are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution for the United States of America, including the State of Texas are also unconstitutional agencies, and they have no authority over “we the people”, and anything done by the United States or any agency of the United States, to Me, is under color of office, and ultra vires,
“Ultra vires. An act performed without any authority to act on subject. Haslund v. City of Seattle, 86 Wash.2d 607, 547 P.2d 1221, 1230. Acts beyond the scope of the powers of a corporation, as defined by its charter or laws of state of incorporation. State ex reI. v. Holston Trust Co., 168 Tenn. 546, 79 S.W.2d 1012, 1016. The term has a broad application and includes not only acts prohibited by the charter, but acts which are in excess of powers granted and not prohibited, and generally applied either when a corporation has no power whatever to do an act, or when the corporation has the power but exercises it irregularly. People ex reI. Barrett v. Bank of Peoria, 295 Ill.App. 543, 15 N.E.2d 333, 335. Act is ultra vires when corporation is without authority to perform it under any circumstances or for any purpose. By doctrine of ultra vires a contract made by a corporation beyond the scope of its corporate powers is unlawful. Community Federal Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Independence, Mo. v. Fields, C.C.A. Mo., 128 F.2d 705, 708. Ultra vires act of municipality is one which is beyond powers conferred upon it by law. Charles v. Town of Jeanerette, Inc., La.App., 234 So.2d 794, 798.” Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition page 1522, [emphasis added] and further,
“ It is well settled that “the Code cannot prevail over the Statutes at Large, when the two are inconsistent.” Stephan v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, 63 S.Ct. 1135, 1137, 80 L.Ed. 1490; Royer’s Inc. v. United States, 3 Cir., 265 F.2d 615. The provisions of the Code are merely prima facie evidence of the law. 1 U.S.C. § 204 (a).”
American Export Lines Inc. v. United States, 290 F.2d 925, at 929 (July 19, 1961)
“Certain titles of the Code have been enacted into positive law, and pursuant to section 204 of title 1 of the Code, the text of those titles is legal evidence of the law contained in those titles. The other titles of the Code are prima facie evidence of the laws contained in those titles. The following titles of the Code have been enacted into positive law: 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 23, 28, 31, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 46, 49 and 51.”
US House of Representatives, Office of Law Revision Counsel website [emphasis added]
“”prima facia” At first sight; on the first appearance; on the face of it; so far as can be judged from the first disclosure; presumably; a fact presumed to be true unless disproved by some evidence to the contrary. State ex rel. Herbert v. Whims, 68 Ohio App. 39, 38 N.E.2d 596, 599, 22 O.O. 110.”
Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition page 1071. [emphasis added]
which means that the following titles of the United States Code are non-positive Law;
Title Nomenclature Title Nomenclature
2 The Congress 6 Domestic Security
7 Agriculture 8 Aliens and Nationality
12 Banks and Banking 15 Trade and Commerce
16 Conservation 19 Customs
20 Education 21 Food and Drugs
22 Foreign Relations 24 Hospitals
25 Indians 26 Internal Revenue
27 Intoxicating Liquors 29 Labor
30 Mineral Lands and Mining 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters
42 The Public Health and Welfare 43 Public Lands
45 Railroads 47 Telegraphs, Telephones and Radios
48 Territories and Insular Possessions 50 War and National Defense
51 National and Commercial Space
and because positive law is law that is properly enacted by proper authority
“Positive Law. Law actually and specifically adopted by proper authority for the government or an organized jural society.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition [Emphasis added]
therefore non-positive law is law that was NOT enacted with proper authority and all of the above listed titles of the United States Code were not enacted with proper authority, like the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 54.03 Emergency Clause is proof that the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is color of law, because it was NOT read on 3 separate days, as required;
“The fact that the laws relating to criminal procedure in this state have not been completely revised and re-codified in more than a century past and the further fact that the administration of justice, in the field of criminal law, has undergone changes, through judicial construction and interpretation of constitutional provisions, which have been, in certain instances, modified or nullified, as the case may be, necessitates important changes requiring the revision or modernization of the laws relating to criminal procedure, and the further fact that it is desirous and desirable to strengthen, and to conform, various provisions in such laws to current interpretation and application, emphasizes the importance of this legislation and all of which, together with the crowded condition of the calendar in both Houses, create an emergency and an imperative public necessity that the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended, and said Rule is hereby suspended, and that this Act shall take effect and be in force and effect from and after 12 o’clock Meridian on the 1st day of January, Anno Domini, 1966, and it is so enacted.” Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 54.03 Emergency Clause [emphasis added]
therefore all non-positive law statutes (improperly enacted statutes) are color of law, a fraud, and unconstitutional,
“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton vs Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, p. 442,
“An unconstitutional law is void, and is as no law. An offence created by it is not a crime.” Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371, 376 (1880), quoted with approval in Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 408 (1963).
and claiming necessity because of emergency is not a good excuse as described herein, and this document is designed to provide evidence that their non-positive law prima facia codes are color of law, are a fraud, created by the US Congress whores in support of their thieving bankster buddies, and mean absolutely nothing, and do NOT exist;
“absolute nullity. Civil law. 1. An act that is void because it is against public policy, law, or order. • The nullity is noncurable. It may be invoked by any party or by the court. See La. Civ. Code arts 7, 2030. 2. The state of such a nullity.” Black’s Law Dictionary 8th Edition, p 3391,
and the United States is a conquered and enslaved nation
“There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.” John Adams 1826
because the US Congress whores sold themselves to the bankster thieves, and it is bankrupt, and enslaved,
“It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent, H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933 – Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.”
United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33 [Emphasis added]
and it has been bankrupt three times and we are now on number four as evidenced by the webpage printout from Dunn and Bradstreet website, a true copy of which is attached hereto, all of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and the creditors always become the owners in any bankruptcy;
“Under the US Airways proposal sent in November, AMR creditors would own 70 percent and US Airways shareholders 30 percent of the merged airline, which could be valued at around $8.5 billion, sources told Reuters on Friday.” AMR Creditors Prefer all Stock Merger with US Airways: sources, by Soyoung Kim, Reuters, Wednesday 12 December 2012 8:38 PM EST, taken from Yahoo Finance [emphasis added]
and it is “civilly dead” and therefore incapable of making positive law,
“Extra legem positus est civiliter mortuus. One out of the pale of the law, (an outlaw,) is civilly dead.” Maxims of Law, Bouvier’s Law dictionary, 1856 Edition,
because ONLY gold or silver coin is lawful money at common law,
“At common law only gold and silver were a legal tender. (2 Inst. 577.)” McClarin v. Nesbit, 2 Nott & McC. (11 S.C.L.) 519 (1820),
and because United States and its agencies and instrumentalities have no lawful money, which includes the State of Texas, and the State of Arizona, and every other state, as well as the fact that they are all controlled and operated by BAR members who are all foreign agents of the Crown;
“INNS OF COURT – These are certain private unincorporated associations, in the nature of collegiate houses, located in London, and invested with the exclusive privilege of calling men to the bar;…” Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition page 709. [emphasis added]
and there is an American Inns of Court, and there are chapters in every state in America, in violation of the true Article Thirteen in Amendment which says;
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” [Emphasis added]
as taken from a certified copy of an 1819 Constitution for the United States of America, taken from Virginia Statutes, a true copy of which is attached to the Affidavit of Criminal Complaint 04/14/07 which is recorded with the Pinal County Recorder at Fee Number 2007-059087, and the Affidavit of Criminal Complaint 06/14/07 which is recorded with the Pinal County Recorder at Fee Number 2007-073069, all of both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and because all BAR members receive a Title of Nobility and an honor from a foreign power, based in London, England;
“TITLE, persons. Titles are distinctions by which a person is known. 3. The constitution of the United States forbids the tyrant by the United States, or any state of any title of nobility. (q. v.)…judges and members of congress that of honorable; and members of the bar and justices of the peace are called esquires. Cooper’s, Justinian, 416′; Brackenridge’s Law Miscell. Index.”
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 Edition, [emphasis added],
“NOBILITAS EST DUPLEX, SUPERIOR ET INFERIOR. 2 Inst. 583. There are two sorts of nobility, the higher and the lower.
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition, page 1198 [emphasis added],
“ESQUIRE. A title applied by courtesy to officers of almost every description, to members of the bar, and others. 2. In England, it is a title next above that of a gentleman, and below a knight.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 Edition, [emphasis added]
therefore, nothing they say or do is lawful, or de jure,
“it never became a law and was as much a nullity as if it had been the act or declaration of an unauthorized assemblage of individuals.” Ryan v. Lynch, 68 Ill. 160 [emphasis added]
and they are incapable of enacting positive law, and they operate completely under the color of law, and they are nothing but criminals, operating in conspiracy with their thieving bankster owners, and further,
“Color” means “An appearance, semblance, or simulacrum, as distinguished from that which is real. A prima facia or apparent right. Hence, a deceptive appearance, a plausible, assumed exterior, concealing a lack of reality; a disguise or pretext. See also colorable.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, on page 240. [emphasis added]
“Colorable” means “That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit feigned, having the appearance of truth.” Windle v. Flinn, 196 Or. 654, 251 P.2d 136, 146. [emphasis added]
“Color of Law” means “The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state is action taken under ‘color of law.'” Atkins v. Lanning. D.C.Okl., 415 F. Supp. 186, 188, [emphasis added]
therefore, everything that is color of law and all ZIP CODES and the US citizen are all frauds, and further,
“Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom’s Max. 349.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856,
and any act by any government official to conceal the fraud becomes an act of fraud;
“fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.”
Bouvier’s Maxims of Law 1856
and fraud is inexcusable and unpardonable;
“Fraus et dolus nemini patrocianari debent. Fraud and deceit should excuse no man. 3 Co. 78.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law 1856
and any fraud amounts to injustice;
“Fraus et jus nunquam cohabitant. Fraud and justice never dwell together.”
Maxims of Law, Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th Edition, page 1832
“Quod alias bonum et justum est, si per vim vei fraudem petatur, malum et injustum efficitur. What is otherwise good and just, if sought by force or fraud, becomes bad and unjust. 3 Co. 78.” Bouvier’s Maxims of Law, 1856, and further,
“When men entered into a State they yielded a part of their absolute rights, or natural liberty, for political or civil liberty, which is no other than natural liberty restrained by human laws, so far as is necessary and expedient for the general advantage of the public. The rights of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring and protecting reputation and property, – and, in general, of attaining objects suitable to their condition, without injury to another, are the rights of a citizen; and all men by nature have them.” Douglass, Adm’r., v. Stephens, Delaware Chancery, Vol. 1, Page 470 (1821) [Emphasis added]
and My ancestors were in America long before the War of Independence, as found in the Statement of Original Status and the pedigree charts which are attached hereto, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety,
“The term, citizens of the United States, must be understood to intend those who were citizens of a State, as such, after the Union had commenced, and the several States had assumed their sovereignties. Before this period there was no citizens of the United States…” Manchester v. Boston, Massachusetts Reports, Vol. 16, Page 235 (1819),
“The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent contract.” see, Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.” CRUDEN vs. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70, [emphasis added]
“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government.”
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
“State citizens are the only ones living under free government, whose rights are incapable of impairment by legislation or judicial decision.“
Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 97, 1908 [emphasis added]
“State Citizenship is a vested substantial property right, and the State has no power to divest or impair these rights.” Favot v. Kingsbury, (1929) 98 Cal. App. 284, 276 P. 1083,
“The sovereignty of a state does not reside in the persons who fill the different departments of its government, but in the People, from whom the government emanated; and they may change it at their discretion. Sovereignty, then in this country, abides with the constituency, and not with the agent; and this remark is true, both in reference to the federal and state government.“ Spooner v. McConnell, 22 F 939 @ 943
and because I am a State Citizen, I am also a judicial power Citizen;
“The judicial power is the power to hear those matters which affect life, liberty or property of the Citizens of the State.” Sapulpa v Land, 101 Okla. 22, 223 Pac. 640, 35 A.L.R. 872,
“The very meaning of ‘sovereignty’ is that the decree of the sovereign makes law.”
American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 29 S.Ct. 511, 513, 213 U.S. 347, 53 L.Ed. 826, 19 Ann.Cas. 1047.
COURT. The person and suit of the sovereign; the place where the sovereign sojourns with his regal retinue, wherever that may be. Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, page 318.
COURT. An agency of the sovereign created by it directly or indirectly under its authority, consisting of one or more officers, established and maintained for the purpose of hearing and determining issues of law and fact regarding legal rights and alleged violations thereof, and of applying the sanctions of the law, authorized to exercise its powers in the course of law at times and places previously determined by lawful authority. Isbill v. Stovall, Tex.Civ.App., 92 S.W.2d 1067, 1070; Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, page 425
and, because I am a judicial power Citizen, I make the law, and I am the law, and I have the power to pass sentence, and My decision is not subject to appeal or modification in any way, except by a common law jury of My peers, and all other courts have to recognize it, because they exist under My authority, and My court is superior to their court, and further,
Statement of Original Status
“Jura sanguinis nullo jure civili dirimi possunt. The right of blood and kindred cannot be destroyed by any civil law. Dig. 50, 17, 9; Bacon’s Max. Reg. 11.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856 Edition, page 768, and further,
Home Building and Loan Association v Blaisdel, 290 US 398 (1934),
“Every consent involves a submission; but a mere submission does not necessarily involve consent.” Black’s, 2d. 249,
in order to fabricate evidence of such a fraudulent US citizen or fictitious entity, or ZIP CODE, or attempts to impose their fictitious non-positive law codes, rules, or regulations on Me, or attempts to steal My compensation for labor based on such a fictitious entity, is operating under color of office,
“Color of office. Pretense of official right to do act made by one who has no such right. Kiker v. Pinson, 120 Ga.App. 784, 172 S.E.2d 333, 334. An act under color of office is an act of an officer who claims authority to do the act by reason of his office when the office does not confer on him any such authority. Maryland Cas. Co. v. McCormack, Ky., 488 S.W.2d 347, 352.” Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition, page 266 [emphasis added]
and is fabricating evidence;
“(a) A person commits an offense if, knowing that an investigation or official proceeding is pending or in progress, he:
(1) alters, destroys, or conceals any record, document, or thing with intent to impair its verity, legibility, or availability as evidence in the investigation or official proceeding; or
(2) makes, presents, or uses any record, document, or thing with knowledge of its falsity and with intent to affect the course or outcome of the investigation or official proceeding.
(d) A person commits an offense if the person:
(1) knowing that an offense has been committed, alters, destroys, or conceals any record, document, or thing with intent to impair its verity, legibility, or availability as evidence in any subsequent investigation of or official proceeding related to the offense; or…” Texas Penal Code Section 37.09. Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence, [emphasis added],
and is violating My rights under the color of law in violation of 18 USC § 242, which says;
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, …….. shall be fined under this title or imprisoned………”
Pub. L. 103-322, Sec. 320201(a), substituted “person in any State” for “inhabitant of any State” in first paragraph.
and 18 USC § 241 says;
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured— They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned…; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned…, or may be sentenced to death.“
and they are engaged in perjury of oath at a minimum, as well as sedition, treason, and more,
“If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.” 18 USC § 2384,
“We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution.” Cohen v Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 [emphasis added]
“Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.” 18 USC § 2383,
and because the Constitution for the United States of America sets up a trust, they are guilty of treason (Breach of Trust), and further,
It has been said, so it is done.
Signed and sealed this _________________day in April, in the year, two thousand and thirteen.
Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, sui juris
Sovereign living soul, holder of the office of “the People”
Judicial Power Citizen by right of blood
Inhabitant of the land known as Texas
With full responsibility for My actions
under the Laws of YHWH as found in the Holy Bible
Arizona republic )
) Subscribed, Sworn, Sealed
Pinal County )
As an officer of the court, I, hereby certify that Glenn Winningham; house of Fearn, who is known to me, appeared before me and after being duly put under oath, he executed the foregoing document on this the ______________________ day of April, in the year two thousand and thirteen.